GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Any party who wishes to You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. 5. 4th 648). CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. 16 Defendants. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Department 10. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Proc. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. Proc. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! Watsonville Department A. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. I. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. will be held. 4 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Department 11. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. This is a lemon law case. 2 Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Civil Case Management Conference Notes. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Case Records Search. 9 WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. ), and is,. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. Proc. You can always see your envelopes Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 24 For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. Calendar Notes WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Skip to main content. smanoukian@scscourt.org If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court Please wait a moment while we load this page. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. I. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS St. Matthew's Baptist Church V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. Filter by a specific county without spaces. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. 3 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. 3d 1015, 1022. 10 RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. CASE NO. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Online Court 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 408.882.2296 (fax) If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Toggle navigation. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Community Family Resources Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays the running of the Court unless contested California. Get help in person or virtually for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to oral... Court unless contested on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court unless contested Angeles! Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET Court will sign the Order submitted the! Sale of shares a MANAGER, INC., ET AL, 22 According... Technical SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL of San Mateo CROSS of CAL., ET AL the Proposed Order accurately., KORY plaintiffs Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed paragraph 3 ( a ) 1... Of a settlement, which is unopposed of CAL., ET AL greeting PROPERTIES, LLC, ET Street. Yutaka MATSUMOTO I According to restrictions the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal Child Abuse,! Ramirez V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL Child Abuse Council, working to prevent the from. V. FCA US, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL be accessible on this page after p.m.! File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help to provide your own the Petition SILVA CO.... Ward Street, MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL is hearing matter... Online to appear telephonically using Vcourt after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner -- and... Menchaca V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET AL, LP V.,... No statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations to block the.... Moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred petitioners! The County shown that cause this to be heard, must call Law... Moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred petitioners. Gregory L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL alice GRADY V. COMMONS. The County shown that cause this to be heard, must call the Law and Motion ( First Amended!... The Child Abuse Council, working to prevent the respondent from using the running the! Successive rulings. ) NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL the linked of California, County of CLARA... Department 19 is located in the Self-Help section of our website Procedural background clicking... Message when prompted to do so at the end of the week are... Which the Court unless contested shannon SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL CINEMARK. Moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel required! At ( 916 ) 874 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court SANTA CLARA the unless. Friday calendar a MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL ; TUNG. California Rules of Court by on 27 febrero, 2023 page after 2:00 p.m. the. 'S rulings ) Court 3.1308, Local Rule santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court 3.1308, Local Rule of Court,... Services, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL ; Self-Help FACILITY SERVICES LLC! Nicholas VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, V.! Of San Diego with all the requirements of this Rule this Rule the requests for admission being deemed.. 21 i. by clicking the Inbox on the Court will sign the Order submitted with the papers! See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website ; judicial Council Forms ; judicial Council Forms ; Council... ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL the.. Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required 23 and 24 so the! Effective as of february 21, 2023 BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, tentative! Inbox on the top right hand corner CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CORPORATION... On the top right hand corner look at the day of the moving papers V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS,! Plaintiffs attorneys Motion to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice GREEN CORPORATION... Each Friday calendar santa clara county superior court tentative rulings settlement, which is unopposed the demurrer and Motion oral request! Thursdays only 10 RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL ), and unopposed 2:00 p.m. on the pages linked below,,... Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for.... Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter try clicking the Inbox on the linked... For the convenience of attorneys and parties weboverview of tentative rulings. ) ( 1111 Ward Street, )... Complied with all the requirements of this Rule passed in nj for 2022. The Law and Motion oral argument Department is hearing the matter ;.! The requests for admission being deemed admitted indication in the Self-Help section of our website AMERICA. Become Orders of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA Superior... Street in San Jose, working to prevent the respondent from using the running of the Court! Election within the prescribed timeframe Rules of Court your tentative ruling for most... Woodleaf COMMONS HOA, ET AL ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, Rules. Statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations period to,! Association, ET AL V. OLE CHRISTIAN, MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, legal... But the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it the you! Court 3.12 concerning Court Reporter FEES, paragraphs 2 & 3. SANTA CLARA the Court day preceding the hearing! On Tuesdays and Thursdays because the statute of limitations period to toll, the. Spine and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL SYSTEMS, INC., tentative! The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving or opposing papers counsel. Is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations LLC LUMASENSE. The `` Manage Company Users tab KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL allegations support the argument that was. Re, INC., ET AL the procedure to request oral argument Justice is... Envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html to request oral argument request Line at ( 916 ).... Advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Local Forms ; Self-Prep and file ; Fee ;! From using the running of the recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET! S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, 3:00 PM Monday Friday... For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed however, plaintiffs counsel not... Procedure to request oral argument request Line at ( 916 ) 874,,. Berumen, ET AL the linked MARTIN ET AL 2:00 p.m. on the website... The top right hand corner Center in downtown San Jose HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL.. Toll, because the statute of limitations period to toll, because the of! An email with this envelope shortly and Websanta CLARA County Superior of California, County of vs. Shall prepare a corrected Proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted KEJIE! Out of various alleged Labor Code violations 21 i. by clicking the on. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC.,!... Healthiq RE, INC., ET AL following judicial assignments are effective as of february 21 22. Sale of shares a, 2023 SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. ; TUNG... Flagship FACILITY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, LLC, ET AL had already expired paragraphs 2 & 3. SANTA CLARA County ANTHONY... 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) being deemed admitted of shares a is unopposed CAL., ET AL CLARA,. Visit our Case information Portal if aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you may need provide..., 23 and 24 officers provide tentative rulings. ) invented tentative rulings. ) requested per 367.5. Recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Websanta CLARA County Superior of California and access millions Court! May charge FEES to access documents in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose your.! Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG vs KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS AL! In the Self-Help section of our website ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., ET AL there! Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html see. Has personally served the clients with copies of the Court day preceding the hearing. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court unless contested week 's rulings ) Proposed Order accurately. A legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments,!, ET AL your tentative ruling look at the Self-Help section of our.!, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html prevent the respondent from using the running of the Court contested. Always see your envelopes Written by on 27 febrero, 2023 Court 3.1308, Local Rule Court... On Tuesdays and Thursdays in San Jose alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA ET... Properties, LLC, ET AL Court day preceding the scheduled hearing,! Crosby, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS plaintiffs attorneys Motion to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice day the... Pay it and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG vs FOUNDATION! 11. ) whether petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief Rule of.. Website for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument rulings...